Confidently produced output that is fluent but factually wrong or fabricated.
Broad technical consensus on what this term means. Disagreements that invoke it are about the world, not the word.
A language model generates plausible next tokens; it does not consult a store of verified facts. Fabrication, invented citations, confident wrong answers, plausible nonexistent details, is therefore a failure mode of normal operation, not a malfunction. The fluency is the trap: errors arrive in the same confident voice as truths.
The term itself draws criticism (some prefer "confabulation"; some argue it anthropomorphizes), but the phenomenon it names is well established. It sits at the center of the reliability question: how much human oversight can be removed from a system that can fabricate?